State v. SUPERIOR CT IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to decide whether article 2, section 24 of the Arizona Constitution forbids race-based peremptory strikes
• white defendant accorded standing to challenge under the Sixth Amendment the prosecution’s use of peremptory challeng-es to exclude the only two black veniremen from the jury
• white defendant accorded standing to challenge under the Sixth Amendment the prosecution's use of peremptory challenges to exclude the only two black veniremen from the jury
• “Because we find Pryor [also cited by Petitioner] inapplicable, we will continue to rely on our earlier holdings that conviction and sentence for both felony murder and the underlying felony is constitutionally permissible.”
• white defendant can raise Batson challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).