State v. Nave
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 348
Syllabus
R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) consecutive sentences R.C. 2953.08. The sentences are affirmed because the trial court did not err in failing to provide reasons in support of the R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings that were incorporated into the final sentencing entry in the relevant case. In addition, the lack of a criminal history does not preclude the imposition of consecutive sentences when the alternative findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(a)-(b) are made and supported by the record.
Judges: Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-19· cited 25×
- State v. SparksOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-20· cited 6×
- State v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-23· cited 5×
- State v. BatesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-03· cited 3×
- State v. CrespoOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-18· cited 2×
- State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-27· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court· 2017-12-19· cited 273×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-10· cited 90×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-15· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.