Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/4/1990
State v. Mott
Citations
- 784 P.2d 278
- 162 Ariz. 452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting appellate argument that the superior court was “required to revoke defendant’s waiver of counsel because of his conduct during the trials”
- court considered psychiatric records from different case that trial court relied on for its ruling
- after waiver, court must continue to monitor defendant’s behavior and order hearings on issue of competency “if it becomes aware of any evidence of defendant’s incompetency to represent himself that would jeopardize his right to a fair trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brooks, Claborne, Jacobson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court· 1994-08-02· cited 97×
- State v. DjerfArizona Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 82×
- State v. McLemoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-30· cited 24×
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-05-26· cited 7×
- State v. BinderCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-03· cited 3×
- In Re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-108721 and F-327521Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.