Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/18/2008
State v. Betts
Citations
- 942 A.2d 364
- 286 Conn. 88
- 2008 Conn. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that [the private actor] was not an agent of the police’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Schaller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- United States v. Russell KinneyFourth Circuit· 1992-02-12· cited 74×
- Rawlings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-06-29· cited 71×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 71×
- State v. BrockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 66×
- State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-11· cited 54×
- State v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-07-20· cited 30×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-06· cited 28×
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-30· cited 20×
- Hamilton v. Bob Bennett FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 18×
- State v. LasagaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-01· cited 18×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-04-02· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.