State v. Bermudez
Citations
- 341 Conn. 233
Syllabus
Convicted, after a jury trial, of the crime of felony murder, the defendant appealed. The defendant and his brothers, S and B, had robbed the victim as he returned home at night after closing the bar he owned, during or after which the victim was shot and killed. Twelve years after the incident, A, the estranged wife of S, provided a written statement to the police that implicated the defendant and his brothers in the victim's death. A, who knew that the defendant and his brothers were affiliated with gangs, delayed providing information to the police, pur- portedly out of fear that the defendant and his brothers would retaliate against her or her family. S had regularly abused A throughout their marriage and, following the victim's murder, had threatened to kill her, their children, and A's mother. While the defendant was incarcerated on unrelated charges during the twelve years after the shooting, he instructed A to write salacious letters to him so that he could discredit her if she were to testify against him. At trial, A's testimony was crucial to the state's case, and, therefore, the reason for her twelve year delay in coming forward and the credibility of her statement inculpating the defendant and his brothers were central issues. In affirming the defen- dant's conviction, the Appellate Court rejected the defendant's claim that the trial court had improperly admitted evidence that he and his brothers were affiliated with gangs and that A and her children had been relocated by the state following her statement to the police. The Appellate Court also rejected the defendant's claim that his constitu- tional rights to present a defense and to confront the witnesses against him was violated insofar as the trial court declined to admit into evidence the letters that A had sent to the defendant and precluded defense counsel from questioning A about the circumstances surrounding the termination of her employment from a hospital and her birth control practices. On th
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Kahn; Ecker; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-10-25· cited 24×
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-02-10· cited 12×
- State v. Adam P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. LanierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-07-11· cited 7×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-02-25· cited 7×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-01· cited 6×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-16· cited 5×
- State v. James A.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-12-19· cited 1×
- State v. OutlawSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-08-06· cited 1×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 393×
- California v. TybergSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 383×
- United States v. Mario Adamo, Richard Marsico, Terry Freeman, Raymond Ripley, Jeffrey Linkous, Ectore Garcia, and Winthrop HongSixth Circuit· 1984-08-22· cited 266×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-02-05· cited 229×
- United States v. DeitzSixth Circuit· 2009-08-20· cited 204×
- United States v. CiampagliaFirst Circuit· 1980-08-04· cited 153×
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-12-16· cited 123×
- United States v. Frank John Schweihs, United States of America v. Anthony F. DaddinoSeventh Circuit· 1992-11-09· cited 110×
- INF, Ltd. v. Spectro Alloys Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 92×
- United States of America, at Nos. 89-5372/5383, at No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, at No. 89-5372, at No. 89-5510 v. Elias Saka, at No. 89-5383Third Circuit· 1990-03-20· cited 83×
- United States v. Rashad McKayEighth Circuit· 2005-12-13· cited 83×
- United States v. Michael Curtis KeysTenth Circuit· 1990-03-30· cited 81×
- United States v. John E. Irvin and Thomas E. PastorSeventh Circuit· 1996-06-20· cited 79×
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-11-05· cited 67×
- State v. CerretaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-21· cited 67×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-08-26· cited 61×
- United States v. Eugene Difrancesco, United States of America v. Eugene DifrancescoSecond Circuit· 1979-08-06· cited 57×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.