Sixth Circuit· 8/20/2009

United States v. Deitz

Citations

577 F.3d 672
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18887
2009 WL 2525563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that cumulative-error analysis is not relevant where no individual ruling was erroneous
noting that plain-error review applied “to new suppression arguments raised for the first time on appeal” (citing United States v. Lopez-Medina, 461 F.3d 724, 739 (6th Cir. 2006))
reviewing whether the defendant affirmatively conveyed his withdrawal of a conspiracy such that the conspiracy charge was misjoined
prosecutor should not refer to witness protection program unless need for protection is obvious, relevant, or made an issue by defense counsel
no plain error in a case in which the defendant failed to preserve the question for appellate review
no plain error in a case in which the defendant failed to preserve the question for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Clay, Cleland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Deitz

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.