Supreme Court of New Jersey· 6/4/1997
State v. Bauman
Citations
- 695 A.2d 667
- 150 N.J. 25
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant's contention that additional charges in a superseding indictment violated his right to due process the new indictment was sought after defendant failed to enter into a plea bargain
- finding \alleged improper remark[ was] clearly [a] 17 A-4358-14T2 remark[] on the credibility of defendant's testimony and [was] therefore unobjectionable\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-04-15· cited 360×
- State, Office of Employee Rel. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-06-09· cited 73×
- State of New Jersey v. Jonathan ZembreskiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-05-17· cited 28×
- State v. GomezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-07-02· cited 23×
- State v. JangNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-03-28· cited 20×
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-03-09· cited 20×
- State v. AtkinsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-03-03· cited 9×
- State v. NelsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-10-21· cited 8×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.