Skip to main content
· 6/9/1998

State, Office of Employee Rel. v. Communications Workers

Citations

  • 711 A.2d 300
  • 154 N.J. 98
  • 1998 N.J. LEXIS 563
  • 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court will ordinarily not introduce an issue the parties have not raised unless the interests of justice require it, and the parties have had a chance to address the issue
  • criticizing Appellate Division’s introduction of arbitrability issue on its own motion and without notice to parties
  • criticizing Appellate Division's introduction of arbitrability issue on its own motion and without notice to parties
  • noting the broad scope of judicial review applicable to public sector arbitration awards and stating that reversal is appropriate whenever an \award violates law or public policy\
  • disapproving of Appellate Division addressing issue — dispute's arbitrability — that parties did not raise before trial court or on appeal
  • “Arbitrators also exceed their authority by disregarding the terms of the parties’ agreement.” (citing PBA Local 160, supra, 272 N.J.Super. at 474, 640 A.2d 341)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pollock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.