State v. Papineau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Only one whose own rights have been violated may seek the remedy of exclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gay
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-01-23· cited 58×
• Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-31· cited 23×
• Artis v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-18· cited 23×
• District of Columbia v. Mancouso
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 7×
• State v. Burns
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-09-19· cited 4×
• State v. Blest
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-08· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. Anthony Shariff Gay
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-01-23
• State v. Vail
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-06-16

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• United States v. DeLutis
  First Circuit· 1983-12-06· cited 89×
• United States v. Jennifer J. Wysong
  Ninth Circuit· 1976-01-22· cited 62×
• State v. Bates
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-11-13· cited 21×
• State v. Sanchez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-03-20· cited 12×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-02-10· cited 10×
• State v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-03-11· cited 5×