State v. Bassett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• blood test results properly admitted where there is “substantial evidence that [defendant] gave his consent to the test . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wetherell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1973-10-11· cited 47×
• Veilleux v. Springer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1973-01-05· cited 25×
• State v. Mastaler
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1971-12-07· cited 19×
• State v. Blouin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-06-26· cited 17×
• State v. Hoffman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-07· cited 3×
• State v. Jackman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1971-02-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Gideon v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 7,325×
• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.
  Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 398×
• State v. Ballou
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1968-02-06· cited 29×
• State v. Auger
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1963-12-03· cited 28×