State v. Barnette
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2870
Syllabus
CIVIL – Conclusory statements in an affidavit filed in support of a motion for leave to file a motion for new trial that the defendant was unaware of new evidence and could not have discovered it until a certain date are insufficient to establish clear and convincing proof that he was unavoidably prevented from the discovery of the evidence before the statutory deadline.
Judges: Dickey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,098×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. HesslerOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-27· cited 189×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-04· cited 81×
- State v. McNealOhio Supreme Court· 2022-08-09· cited 66×
- State v. BarnetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-17· cited 9×
- State v. BarnetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-18· cited 9×
- State v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-12· cited 7×
- State v. BarnetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-15· cited 5×
- State v. BarnetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-27· cited 4×
- State v. BarnetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-15· cited 1×
- State ex rel. Barnette v. SweeneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.