State v. Barnette

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 2484

Syllabus

REOPENING – App.R. 26(B) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel second untimely pro se application to reopen direct appeal no case authority authorizing a party to file successive applications for reopening Appellant's present application filed approximately six and one-half years after this court's decision clearly untimely on its face as it was not filed within the 90-day time requirement pursuant to App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b) Appellant again fails to establish good cause for the delay even assuming that Appellant had complied with the requirements of App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b), he fails to meet the standard for reopening this appeal pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984) Appellant fails to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on appeal application denied.