Skip to main content

State v. Barnes

Citations

  • 948 P.2d 627
  • 263 Kan. 249
  • 1997 Kan. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding district court's decision that defendant was competent and any expressed confusion over trial process was result of malingering
  • subjective prong of self-defense test not met where evidence indicates defendant either initiated or willingly participated in mutual combat
  • when defendant furnished attorney for purpose of filing notice of appeal, attorney failed to perfect, court would entertain untimely appeal filed 5 days after deadline pursuant to Ortiz
  • subjective prong of self-defense test not met where evidence indicated defendant either initiated or willingly participated in mutual combat
  • defendant’s responses in court supported conclusion on his ability to help with his defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.