Skip to main content

State v. Leak

Citations

  • 998 A.2d 1182
  • 297 Conn. 524
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court had inherent common-law power to impose on defendant consecutive terms of commitment following insanity acquittals of multiple offenses by staying execution of one term of commitment until expiration of another term of commitment
  • courts 13 have \inherent common-law power to stay the execution of their own judgments and thereby order that confinements run consecutively\; power continues in lieu of clear legislative mandate to alter the common law even in the absence of an express statutory conferral of authority
  • courts have “inherent common-law power to stay the execution of their own judgments and thereby order that confine ments run consecutively”; power continues in lieu of clear legislative mandate to alter the common law even in the absence of an express statutory conferral of authority
  • “[i]n determining whether or not a statute abrogates or modifies a common law rule the construction must be strict, and the operation of a statute in derogation of the common law is to be limited to matters clearly brought within its scope” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.