Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/27/2010
State v. Leak
Citations
- 998 A.2d 1182
- 297 Conn. 524
- 2010 Conn. LEXIS 268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court had inherent common-law power to impose on defendant consecutive terms of commitment following insanity acquittals of multiple offenses by staying execution of one term of commitment until expiration of another term of commitment
- courts 13 have \inherent common-law power to stay the execution of their own judgments and thereby order that confinements run consecutively\; power continues in lieu of clear legislative mandate to alter the common law even in the absence of an express statutory conferral of authority
- courts have “inherent common-law power to stay the execution of their own judgments and thereby order that confine ments run consecutively”; power continues in lieu of clear legislative mandate to alter the common law even in the absence of an express statutory conferral of authority
- “[i]n determining whether or not a statute abrogates or modifies a common law rule the construction must be strict, and the operation of a statute in derogation of the common law is to be limited to matters clearly brought within its scope” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-06-26· cited 61×
- Yeager v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-22· cited 9×
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-17· cited 8×
- Falvey v. ZUROLOConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-19· cited 6×
- State v. WebsterConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-15· cited 3×
- State v. JIMMY S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-02-22· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 143×
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 107×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-10-07· cited 105×
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-29· cited 73×
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-09· cited 70×
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-30· cited 62×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-27· cited 55×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-04-27· cited 42×
- Copeland v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-16· cited 40×
- State v. PinaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-11-17· cited 37×
- Tatro v. TatroConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-02-15· cited 27×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-01-07· cited 16×
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-04-24· cited 12×
- Fennelly v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-01-19· cited 11×
- Grant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-03-08· cited 10×
- State v. BanksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-01· cited 9×
- State v. C.A.J.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-12-06· cited 9×
- Woodrow Wilson of Middletown, LLC v. Connecticut Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-02· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.