Court of Appeals of Utah· 11/1/1988
State v. Baird
Citations
- 763 P.2d 1214
- 94 Utah Adv. Rep. 40
- 1988 Utah App. LEXIS 163
- 1988 WL 116729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Sergeant Mangelson had no reasonable articulable suspicion to stop a vehicle that was driving within the speed limit when he stopped the car because “‘something just struck me funny about it’”
- concluding that Sergeant Mangelson had no reasonable articulable suspicion to stop a vehicle that was driving within the speed limit when he stopped the car because “ ‘something just struck me funny about it’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garff, Davidson, Orme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court· 1994-04-25· cited 119×
- State v. HarmonUtah Supreme Court· 1995-12-14· cited 58×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-05-03· cited 30×
- State v. StewardCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-02-06· cited 30×
- State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-03-15· cited 27×
- State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-12-05· cited 21×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-05-05· cited 20×
- State v. NaisbittCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-03-02· cited 19×
- State v. FriesenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-09-16· cited 15×
- State v. RothCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-02-21· cited 13×
- State v. Figueroa-SolorioCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-03-25· cited 11×
- State v. SeelCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-02-25· cited 11×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-06-12· cited 10×
- State v. LovegrenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-03-30· cited 10×
- State v. Martinez-CastellanosCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-01-20· cited 6×
- Sandy City v. ThorsnessCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-08-18· cited 5×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,044×
- State v. MendozaUtah Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 78×
- State v. SierraCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-05-18· cited 49×
- State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-06-19· cited 47×
- State v. SwaniganUtah Supreme Court· 1985-03-28· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.