Court of Appeals of Utah· 5/3/1989
State v. Holmes
Citations
- 774 P.2d 506
- 107 Utah Adv. Rep. 74
- 1989 Utah App. LEXIS 68
- 1989 WL 45377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant’s “attempt to stuff [a] roll of paper towels down between the ear seat and the console,” standing alone, was not enough to establish probable cause
- agreeing with the defendant “that an area’s reputation ... should not be imputed to an individual” but discussing that the facts of the case showed “the police suspected a prostitution deal” based on the behavior observed “in an area known for prostitution activity”
- \the law does not require that `all innocent explanations for a person's actions be absent before those actions can provide probable cause for an arrest'\
- “the law does not require that ‘all innocent explanations for a person’s actions be absent before those actions can provide probable cause for an arrest’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bench, Billings, Greenwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-03-26· cited 78×
- Provo City v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-12-09· cited 41×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-09-21· cited 36×
- State v. GrovierCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-03-07· cited 31×
- State v. BartleyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-12-20· cited 23×
- State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-12-05· cited 21×
- State in Interest of NHBCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-06-30· cited 20×
- State v. MunsenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-11-07· cited 19×
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-10-29· cited 18×
- State v. CayerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-06-25· cited 14×
- State v. RothCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-02-21· cited 13×
- State v. RochellCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-04-01· cited 12×
- State v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-10-19· cited 12×
- State v. KeitzCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-06-30· cited 11×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-06-12· cited 10×
- State v. CornwallCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-04-19· cited 9×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-11-05· cited 9×
- State v. GrossiCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-06-05· cited 9×
- People v. McKayColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-07-06· cited 6×
- Sandy City v. ThorsnessCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-08-18· cited 5×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 1,010×
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-12-31· cited 307×
- State v. MendozaUtah Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 78×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.