Skip to main content

Caruso v. State

Citations

  • 645 So. 2d 389
  • 1994 WL 540716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is error to permit the State to call a witness to contradict collateral answers given dining the State’s cross-examination of another witness
  • lengthy history of drug abuse and abuse of heroin, marijuana, and alcohol on daily basis immediately prior to murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.