Skip to main content

State v. Austin

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 1983

Syllabus

Postrelease control plea agreement guilty sentence Crim.R. 11 prejudice substantial compliance breach maximum penalty nature of the charges voluntary knowing intelligent. Defendant's guilty pleas were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. The trial court substantially complied with the nonconstitutional requirements of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a). The record does not support the defendant's position that the trial court's imposition of postrelease control breached a term of his plea agreement with the state.

Judges: E. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.