State v. Sullivan
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1036
Syllabus
Crim.R. 11(C) plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made de novo review substantial compliance maximum penalty mandatory postrelease control R.C. 2929.141 Reagan Tokes Law required advisements R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c). The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11 and appellant's plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. However, because the trial court failed to fully notify appellant of the R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) advisements, the case is remanded for resentencing solely to provide the proper advisements.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. WhiteheadOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-18· cited 21×
- State v. GatesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-19· cited 17×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-03· cited 7×
- State v. AustinOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-23· cited 6×
- State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.