State v. Prince

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \There is nothing in HRS § 606-12 that precludes the recording of a closing argument. Counsel has a privilege to request in advance that closing argument be recorded[.]\
• defendant ripping picture off the hotel wall was “probative of a disregard for money” and “wild[] spending spree” showed defendant’s money was not hard-earned, which supported the inference it came from the charged robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Estrada
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 106×
• Walsh v. Chan
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-12-27· cited 41×
• State v. Austin
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-03-01· cited 12×
• State v. Griffin
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2011-11-22· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Melear
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1981-06-30· cited 79×