State v. Woodfork

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 2555

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant's post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea because appellant failed to establish a manifest injustice warranting the withdrawal of his plea. The trial court did not err by failing to rule on appellant's pro se motion to modify his community control sanctions where appellant was represented by counsel and counsel did not join in the pro se motion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding appellant guilty of violating his community control sanctions after appellant refused to participate in an inpatient drug treatment program as required by the terms of his community control. The trial court properly revoked appellant's community control based on that violation and properly sentenced him to 30 months in prison, as the sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. Judgments affirmed.