State v. Arszman
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4132
Syllabus
APPELLATE REVIEW/CRIMINAL – JURISDICTION – FINAL ORDER – SEX OFFENSES: The trial court's order purporting to classify defendant as a Tier I sex offender under Ohio's version of the Adam Walsh Act was not final and appealable, because it did not meet the requirement that the judgment of conviction must be a single document that includes the fact of conviction, the sentence, the judge's signature, and the time stamp therefore, defendant's appeal from that order must be dismissed.
Judges: Cunningham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 500×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-13· cited 406×
- State v. HoldcroftOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-20· cited 230×
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-01· cited 38×
- State v. HalseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-05· cited 21×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-27· cited 17×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-12· cited 13×
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-21· cited 8×
- State v. HildebrandOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-27· cited 8×
- State v. ArszmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-25· cited 6×
- State v. ArszmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-13· cited 4×
- State v. McLendonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.