State v. Arszman
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7581
Syllabus
SEX OFFENSES - REGISTRATION: Where defendant, after his conviction for gross sexual imposition, was improperly classified as a Tier II sex offender, and the appellate court reversed the Tier II classification and remanded the cause for the trial court to correct the classification to Tier I, but the trial court did not carry out the remand order before defendant was released from his prison sentence, and where, after his release from prison, defendant filed a motion for relief from his duty to register as a sex offender and to vacate his sex-offender classification, the trial court's judgment overruling defendant's motion must be affirmed because there is no order in place requiring defendant to register as a sex offender and no classification to vacate, and the cause must be remanded for the trial court to consider whether it has authority to notify defendant of and impose upon him Tier I sex-offender registration requirements after he has been released from his term of imprisonment.
Judges: Cunningham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.