Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/30/1992

State v. Arrington

Citations

840 P.2d 477
251 Kan. 747
1992 Kan. LEXIS 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding expert witness could testify that severely retarded child victim was incapable of being deliberately deceitful
expert testimony that a witness was not capable of being purposefully deceitful was not improper
expert testimony that a witness was not capable of being purposefully deceitful was not improper
Although a close question, therapist's testimony did not cross the line when she testified that she did not think that her severely mentally retarded patient was capable of being purposefully deceitful
Although a close question, therapist’s testimony did not cross the line when she testified that she did not think that her severely mentally retarded patient was capable of being purposefully deceitful
admission of evidence, even if erroneous, may not be raised on appeal unless timely objection in record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.