Skip to main content

State v. Armstrong

Citations

  • 712 P.2d 1258
  • 238 Kan. 559
  • 1986 Kan. LEXIS 254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant was not entitled to dismissal on basis that statutes under which he was charged had been amended after the offenses were committed
  • concluding district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for a bill of particulars when the State charged defendant with taking aggravated indecent liberties with an 11-year-old child over a 5-month time frame

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.