Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/10/1992
State v. Hammond
Citations
- 837 P.2d 816
- 251 Kan. 501
- 1992 Kan. LEXIS 136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no multiplicity between aggravated robbery and aggravated kidnapping charges under similar facts
- finding no multiplicity between aggravated robbery and aggravated kidnapping charges under similar facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Six
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-12-15· cited 63×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-10-28· cited 44×
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-09-28· cited 38×
- State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-02-28· cited 36×
- State v. SoddersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-04-15· cited 27×
- State v. OchoaCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-04-28· cited 22×
- State v. KempCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-05-10· cited 21×
- Loggins v. ClineD. Kansas· 2008-07-30
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-03-06· cited 242×
- State v. ZamoraSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-12-14· cited 72×
- State v. ChatmonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-10-21· cited 48×
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-02-20· cited 46×
- State v. McQueen & HardywaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-07-15· cited 38×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 29×
- State v. HennesseeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-02-19· cited 24×
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-01-17· cited 24×
- State v. WeisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-05-25· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.