State v. Armengau

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 1010

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's presentence motion for dismissal \pursuant to Crim.R. 29 and the United States Constitution and the Ohio Constitution\ filed after this court decided his direct appeal, affirming in part and reversing in part, and remanding only for resentencing particular counts and to address sex-offender classification. Appellant's assignments of error are overruled on the grounds of res judicata, law of the case, and on the merits, seeing no course to revisit the issues raised and previously addressed by this court's decision in appellant's direct appeal. Judgment affirmed.