District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/6/2013
State v. Arevalo
Citations
- 112 So. 3d 529
- 2013 WL 811586
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the defendant’s parking in a no-parking zone provided probable cause for the traffic stop
- “The deputy observed appellee park in a grassy area marked with ‘do not park’ signs, which provided the deputy with probable cause to conduct a traffic stop.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ciklin, Levine, Warner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Braddy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-11-15· cited 96×
- Cresswell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-05-10· cited 76×
- State v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-06-06· cited 11×
- Reid v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-16· cited 6×
- Gilbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-21· cited 6×
- D.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-29· cited 5×
- K.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.