Wisconsin Supreme Court· 5/29/1992

State v. Annala

Citations

484 N.W.2d 138
168 Wis. 2d 453
1992 Wisc. LEXIS 306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

the right to a remedy was a matter of importance since the state's early days of statehood and therefore strict scrutiny was appropriate
the right to a remedy was a matter of importance since the state's early days of statehood and therefore strict scrutiny was appropriate
the decision to prosecute cannot be deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification
abuse of prosecutorial discretion to bring charges when evidence is clearly insufficient to support conviction; constitutional violation possible in selective prosecution deliberately based on an unjustified standard such as race, religion or other arbitrary classification
using terms \ab initio\ and \de novo\ interchangeably
denying \fundamental right to be treated as a juvenile\ exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abrahamson, Callow, Heffernan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.