Myers v. Univ. Hosps. Health Sys.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff established standing by proving harms flowing from the government’s designation of three films as “political propaganda”
• holding that the plaintiff established standing by proving harms flowing from the government's designation of three films as \political propaganda\
• holding that harm to reputation is a cognizable injury for standing in First Amendment retaliation cases
• concluding that plaintiff had Article III standing where government action was alleged to have threatened his professional reputation
• concluding that a plaintiff who wished to exhibit certain films had standing to challenge a statute requiring him to characterize those films as “political propaganda”
• stating that “the need to take . . . affirmative steps to avoid the risk of harm . . . constitutes a cognizable injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).