State v. Anderson
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2191
Syllabus
The trial court did not violate Crim.R. 11 by failing to advise appellant of the potential for consecutive sentences or about his eligibility for community-control sanctions. The record does not affirmatively demonstrate the trial court's failure to consider the youth sentencing factors found in R.C. 2929.19(B)(1)(b). The trial court did err, however, in its award of jail-time credit. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for recalculation of jail-time credit.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-08· cited 36×
- State v. GoldblumOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 31×
- State v. WillardOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-26· cited 30×
- State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-29· cited 14×
- State v. SegoviaOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-12· cited 7×
- State v. ShadeOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-28· cited 5×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-13· cited 4×
- State v. SwaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-24· cited 4×
- State v. KoobOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-22· cited 2×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-01· cited 1×
- State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.