Skip to main content

State v. Segovia

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1392

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in admitting evidence of a drug debt owed by the victim to appellant in appellant's trial for felonious assault. The evidence was admitted for the legitimate purpose of establishing appellant's identity and motive and not his propensity to commit crime, and the court gave a limiting instruction. Appellant's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.