Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 4/11/1905

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 137 F. 858
  • 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4215

Syllabus

<p>1. Bankruptcy—Claims—Disallowance—Appeal.</p> <p>Where ¿ state filed a claim against a bankrupt corporation for an alleged franchise tax, and more than $500 of such claim was disallowed, the state was entitled to appeal from such disallowance, under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 25a, 30 Stat. 553 [IX. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432], authorizing appeals to the Circuit Court of Appeals from a judgment allowing or rejecting a debt or claim of $500 or over.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—Appeal and review in bankruptcy cases, see note to In re .. Eggert, 43 C. C. A. 9.]</p> <p>2. Same—Scope oe Review.</p> <p>Where the disallowance of a claim against a bankrupt’s estate was properly in the Circuit Court of Appeals by an appeal respecting the amount of the claim, taken as authorized by Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 25a, 30 Stat. 553 [IX. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432], the appellant was entitled to present any question concerning the security or rank of the debt, as an incident thereof.</p> <p>3. Taxes—State Decisions—Eeeect on Federal Courts.</p> <p>A federal court of bankruptcy, in determining whether a state imposi- ■ tion is a tax, within Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 64a, 30 Stat. 563 [IX. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3447], requiring priority of payment thereof, will not be bound by the decisions of the state courts unless the state decisions have authoritatively expounded the substance of the question, and not merely given the name “tax” to an exaction which is not such.-</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—State laws as rules of decision in federal courts see notes-' to Wilson v. Perrin, 11 C. C. A. 71; Hill v. Hite, 29 C. C. A. 553.]</p> <p>4. - Same—State Statutes—Construction—Corporate Impositions.</p> <p>A state statute requiring all corporations incorporated under the laws of the state, with certain, specified exceptions, to pay an annual license fee or franchise fax of one-tenth of 1 per cent, of all amounts of capitaL stock issued and outstanding, etc., was not a tax on the corporat

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.