In re Danville Rolling Mill Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “service on [defendant’s] counsel . . . would not run afoul of the Hague Convention”; collecting cases
• finding that service on U.S. counsel does not violate the Hague Convention and that service on corporate officer through corporate attorney is proper
• ordering that service through a foreign residents counsel in the United States was a valid form of service
• noting that service via the Hague Convention would take “approximately six to eight months”
• concluding six to eight month delay due to Hague Convention service justified alternative service
• finding that “it is impossible to imagine that a corporation’s attorney would not advise the corporation’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the fact that service destined for that officer had been made upon its attorney”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).