State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Burnett indictment “did not include wording that could be viewed as describing the missing essential element”
• declining to decide mental state requirement of felon-in-possession statute where appellate argument that the indictment was legally insufficient could be rejected regardless of the statute’s construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Benson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-08-11· cited 3×
• State v. Doty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-02· cited 2×
• State v. Petri
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-02-03
• State v. Perelli
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-26