State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an order of restitution when “by implication, restitution was potentially involved” because the district court ordered a victim impact statement before sentencing, and presentencing documents recommended restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-16· cited 12×
• In Re the Welfare of M.R.H.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-06-13· cited 7×
• Fidele Ndaruhutse v. State of Minnesota
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Muller
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-11-06· cited 14×
• State v. Jola
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-07-07· cited 9×
• State v. Hanson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-12· cited 6×