Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 7/29/1986
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 391 N.W.2d 527
- 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a jury could know that a defendant “would remain in custody for at least a few days after arrest for three aggravated 4 robberies” and declining to find reversible error for two inadvertent references to the defendant’s post-offense incarceration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randall, Lansing, Huspeni
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-08· cited 202×
- State v. LeinweberSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-04-04· cited 128×
- State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-09-12· cited 104×
- City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-12-12· cited 90×
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-09-05· cited 71×
- State v. HjerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-12-14· cited 43×
- State v. MontjoySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-12· cited 40×
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-16· cited 22×
- State v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-04· cited 8×
- State v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-12-24· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.