State v. Halverson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The prejudicial value of the evidence was limited by a cautionary instruction and by the fact that no evidence of the nature of the crime for which appellant was in jail was introduced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Rudd
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-04-28· cited 39×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-12-05· cited 12×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-29· cited 4×
• State v. Stafford
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-05· cited 3×
• State v. Belssner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-12-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Willie James Brown v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-01-11· cited 267×
• United States v. Stanley Weisz, United States of America v. Eugene Robert Ciuzio
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-02-21· cited 153×
• State v. Black
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-03-14· cited 69×
• State v. Hjerstrom
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-12-14· cited 43×
• State v. Matteson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-16· cited 30×
• State v. Titworth
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-05-27· cited 20×
• State v. Dinneen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-07-05· cited 11×