State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no fundamental unfairness to the accused where, despite the court’s refusal to allow alibi evidence, the defendant managed to present it anyway
• distinguishing the defenses of alibi and denial by noting that testimony showing the defendant was not present at the scene of the crime, without specification of the defendant’s precise location, is not an alibi, but a mere denial
• testimony by an accused that he was not present at the scene of the crime, without the specification of a precise location, is not an “alibi”; rather, it is a mere denial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-02-25· cited 24×
• State v. Parker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-08-15· cited 15×
• State v. Simonton
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-07-17· cited 12×
• Jennifer A. Britt v. Jeremy M. Otto
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-03-26· cited 10×
• State v. Allen
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-06-04· cited 8×
• State v. Deffebaugh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-05-14· cited 7×
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. KARL DAVID LAWRENCE
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-01-15· cited 6×
• State v. Deffebaugh
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-10-10· cited 1×
• State of Tennessee v. Randy Joe McNew
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2009-10-13

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
• Wardius v. Oregon
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 827×
• State v. Mansfield
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-08-31· cited 41×
• State v. Cox
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-08-10· cited 19×
• State v. Williamson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-06-14· cited 19×