State v. Simonton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant was prejudiced from the exclusion of a doctor’s testimony even though it may have been cumulative to that of another doctor because the excluded witness’s testimony was more significant and- could have affected the outcome of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).