Skip to main content
· 8/19/1997

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry HAY, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 122 F.3d 1233
  • 47 Fed. R. Serv. 692
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6595
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 10729
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21864
  • 1997 WL 469689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where jury heard complex, technical evidence against defendants over the course of nearly four months, forty-eight day delay between the close of evidence and jury deliberations deemed prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Skopil, Pregerson, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.