New Mexico Supreme Court· 8/25/2009
State v. Anaya
Citations
- 217 P.3d 586
- 147 N.M. 100
- 2009 NMSC 043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evading a marked checkpoint is a specific and articulable fact supplying sufficient reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop, police could thus stop driver who made a U-turn at sign indicating an upcoming checkpoint
- reasonable suspicion where defendant made a U-turn at intersection right in front of visible sign announcing checkpoint, and defendant then proceeded in the opposite direction, inconsistent with typical driving patterns given the location of the highway
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maes, Chávez, Serna, Bosson, Daniels
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HubbleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-03-31· cited 169×
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-08-31· cited 106×
- State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 92×
- State v. DuarteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-12-07· cited 81×
- City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 64×
- Snyder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-23· cited 56×
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-04-08· cited 40×
- Steinbeck v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1993-10-08· cited 20×
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-04-18· cited 3×
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-05-30· cited 2×
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-05-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.