Burroughs v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, CTY., BERNALILLO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this Court “will not read into a statute or ordinance language which is not there, particularly if it makes sense as written”
• stating that appellate court “will not read into a statute or ordinance language which is not there, particularly if it makes sense as written”
• stating that we follow the plain language of an ordinance, and will not read language into it if it makes sense as written
• stating that we follow the plain language of an ordinance, and will not read language into it if it makes sense as written
• stating that reviewing courts construe ordinances according to the plain language, and will not add language if an ordinance makes sense as written
• stating that an appellate court “will not read into a statute ... language which is not there, particularly if it makes sense as written”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).