Skip to main content

State v. Allen

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 878

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's petition for postconviction relief. The state properly sought a direct indictment against appellant, so the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over appellant's case. The trial court's judgment entry is sufficient to constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law for purposes of R.C. 2953.21(D).

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.