Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/29/2017

State v. Allen

Citations

2017 Ohio 7976

Syllabus

Appellant's motions are untimely successive petitions for postconviction relief that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to consider and are barred by res judicata. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motions.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Jackson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-10· cited 33×
State ex rel. Allen v. Goulding (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-03-14· cited 13×
State v. Allen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-09· cited 2×
State v. McRae
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-22· cited 2×
State v. Medford
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-21· cited 2×
State v. Williams
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-11

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Fischer
Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
State v. Saxon
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
State v. Lester
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
State v. Baker
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 500×
State v. Williams (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 230×
State v. Allen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-22· cited 4×
State v. Myers
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-31· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.