State v. Kraus
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 5283
Syllabus
The trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider appellant's untimely petition for post-conviction relief. Appellant did not file his petition until after the applicable 365-day period of R.C. 2953.21(A)(2), and appellant did not attempt to demonstrate that R.C. 2953.23(A) was applicable. Trial court was not required to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law before dismissing the untimely petition.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- Risner v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Ohio Div. of Wildlife (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-09-17· cited 116×
- Hook v. HookOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-09-03· cited 11×
- State v. KrausOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-02· cited 3×
- State v. HollingsworthOhio Supreme Court· 2008-04-30· cited 3×
- State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.