State v. O.E.P.-T.

Citations

• 218 N.E.3d 237
• 2023 Ohio 2035

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for rape and other offenses were supported by sufficient evidence and were not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's unsubstantiated speculation about the existence of evidence not provided by the state failed to meet the criteria for a Brady violation. Trial court's denial of appellant's requested jury instruction was not an abuse of discretion. Appellant failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel and did not demonstrate error as to the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences, which included maximum, mandatory prison terms with life tails. Judgment affirmed.