New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 5/31/1995
State v. Allan
Citations
- 283 N.J. Super. 622
- 662 A.2d 1038
- 1995 N.J. Super. LEXIS 276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the better practice is to conduct two separate proceedings unless both sides consent and defense counsel is given wide latitude in cross-examining the State's witnesses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- State v. BudisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-08-06· cited 114×
- State v. MazurekNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-12-08· cited 16×
- State v. TuckerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-06-28· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.