New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/8/1997
State v. Smith
Citations
- 306 N.J. Super. 370
- 703 A.2d 954
- 1997 N.J. Super. LEXIS 472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the stop was justified based upon the officer's observations of defendant weaving in and out of lanes
- \Plea agreements contingent upon joint pleas of A-3174-21 18 co-defendants are commonplace and based to some degree upon the prosecutor's evaluation of tactical decisions and proofs at trial.\
- vehicle weaving in and out of its lane
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collester, Temporarily
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-03-02· cited 859×
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court· 1999-01-28· cited 310×
- Freeman v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-01-23· cited 103×
- MAG v. Division of ABCNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-07· cited 68×
- State v. BallardNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-06-08· cited 34×
- State v. HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-03-17· cited 34×
- State v. CereficeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-11-27· cited 32×
- State v. CryanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-04-16· cited 31×
- State v. PuzioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-08-01· cited 17×
- State v. BarrowNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-07-31· cited 16×
- State v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-06-27· cited 15×
- State of New Jersey v. Julian B. HamlettNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-03-03· cited 15×
- State v. VelezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-12-06· cited 10×
- State v. HalseyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-06-01· cited 8×
- State v. ClarkNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-11-28· cited 7×
- State in the Interest of D.K.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-05-01· cited 7×
- In Re Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act RulesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-05-17· cited 6×
- State v. ConwayNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-10-14· cited 6×
- State v. WilliamsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-12-06· cited 5×
- State v. DIORIONew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-10-20· cited 5×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 6,061×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 1,801×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-04-20· cited 1,662×
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 1,007×
- State v. BruzzeseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-08-08· cited 310×
- State v. McQuaidSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-02-19· cited 296×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-04-19· cited 133×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-06-21· cited 125×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-01-26· cited 107×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1972-07-24· cited 104×
- United States v. Dean S. Hazel, (81-1616), James G. Lott, (81-1630)Sixth Circuit· 1983-01-05· cited 66×
- State v. DemeterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-06-05· cited 64×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-10-21· cited 43×
- State v. KennedyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-03-25· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.