Skip to main content

State v. Adler

Citations

  • 118 P.3d 652
  • 108 Haw. 169
  • 2005 Haw. LEXIS 425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “this court has consistently held that every enactment of the legislature is presumptively constitutional, and a party challenging the statute has the burden of showing unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt”
  • stating that judicial estoppel does not allow a party to \maintain inconsistent positions\ that will prejudice another party
  • explaining appellants bear \the burden to show error by reference to matters in the record\ and courts are \not obligated to sift through the voluminous record to verify an appellant's inadequately documented contentions\ (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • defendant judicially estopped from claiming on appeal he possessed marijuana by prescription when he conceded in motion to dismiss it cannot be prescribed
  • “Appellants must show a ‘substantial burden’ on religious interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.